| nyman
linden - ask the accountant
“ Many people are still
making ill-informed and somewhat irrational statements
regarding the legislation on Managed Service Companies – it’s
not complicated”
Andrew Plaskow FCA
For
this issue of intouch, Andrew Plaskow – a Partner
at Nyman Linden Chartered Accountants and head of the
firm’s UK Contractor Division – has decided
to address a situation that appears to be shaking the
UK contracting market down to its foundations. The firm
has been busy calming agencies, contractors and end clients
on a piece of legislation that is straightforward.
In my answers to your questions posed in issue 9 of intouch, I explained how
the Treasury used this year’s Budget to not only wipe out the tax
advantages to contractors operating in the UK through a Managed Service
Company (MSC), but to also openly declare that Personal Service Companies
(PSCs) will not be within the scope of these measures. In the six months
since the legislation came into being, these objectives have not changed.
So,
if you are grossing more than £35,000 per year
and have been operating through an MSC, you should definitely
be contacting a regulated firm of accountants to ask
about the potential benefits of working through your
own PSC. Modesty forbids me from recommending Nyman Linden
Chartered Accountants as your first port of call. Conversely,
if you are earning less than £35,000 a year, my
advice is still to continue operating through the TAC
or TPS PAYE service or through an umbrella company.
In
Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs’ (HMRC)
own words, the prime objective of the MSC legislation
is to, “curtail the mass non-compliance by MSC
providers whose core activity was to disguise employment
income of individual workers who could not normally satisfy
the criteria of being in business in their own right”.
With
TAC and TPS being notable exceptions, the vast majority
of recruitment agencies have abandoned their Preferred
and/or Approved Supplier Lists of tax advisors like hot
potatoes and still refuse to endorse the PSC as a legal
and legitimate structure to contract with
Contractors
seeking help from those recruitment agencies are simply
told to either go through an umbrella company or “seek
professional advice”. As the umbrella option is
not always appropriate, they are left surfing the internet
in the hope of finding the service and service provider
that best meets their individual needs. In particular,
for someone who has never previously needed a tax efficient
operating structure, the thought of trawling the internet,
understanding what really underpins the selling copy
and, when you meet certain providers, understanding their
jargon, must all be draining. No wonder so many contractors
end up in inappropriate structures or with unsuitable
advisors or, in a growing number of cases, working under
illegal offshore tax regimes.
It
is quite ridiculous for recruitment agencies to adopt
this ‘stand-off’ approach
There
are too many recruitment agencies continuing to distance
themselves from the financial affairs of their contractors
for fear of being inadvertently caught out by the effect
of the new debt transfer liabilities, which makes them
liable for contractors’ unpaid tax. For those agencies
I will quote from a recent HMRC statement, “…Recruitment
Businesses are refusing to deal with Service Providers
who provide service companies (PSCs) to workers. It is
clearly important that Recruitment Businesses consider
the implications of the transfer of debt provisions and
take reasonable steps to mitigate their exposure to those
provisions. However, it is important to remember that
the legislation was …. not introduced to stop those
genuinely in business on their own account providing
their services through service companies (PSCs). HMRC
has provided guidance to help Recruitment Businesses
take a balanced view on their risk under the transfer
of debt provisions.”
TAC and TPS are among the few
to follow this advice having initiated a simple but
effective ‘due diligence’ process to ensure
a PSC is not an MSC in disguise. If such high profile
and successful agencies have been able to adopt this
process, why haven’t the rest?
Let
me be absolutely clear, the legislation provides a specific
exclusion for professionally qualified persons who are
regulated by a regulatory body – as are all the
partners at Nyman Linden Chartered Accountants
This
exemption only applies because the firm is merely providing
professional services and is NOT involved with the PSC.
So, whilst a recruitment agency has to consider the risk
of transfer of debt when encouraging contractors to seek
advice from Nyman Linden, such a debt can only be an
issue if Nyman Linden was involved in the PSC (which
it is not) and HMRC was unable to recover the debt from
the contractor.
It
is a fact that TAC and TPS have always wanted their contractors
to benefit from quality, specific, regulated advice that
both agencies recognise is best obtained by encouraging
them to speak with a firm of Chartered Accountants, highly
experienced in the contractor market. As many of you
reading this article will recall, Nyman Linden attended
TAC and TPS contractor road shows earlier this year to
explain the impact of the new legislation and cover other
areas of interest to contractors and attending executives
from the agencies’ clients.
Unlike
TAC and TPS, many other recruitment agencies have inadvertently
opened the floodgates to non-compliance with innocent
contractors being led, none the wiser, into inappropriate
tax regimes with potential unexpected tax debt. Nyman
Linden and the government now see a wide opening for
disreputable organisations to freely walk in and seduce
contractors into dubious schemes – many of them
located offshore. These will certainly fuel the risk
of recruitment agencies being caught by the transfer
of debt provisions.
Within
a relatively short period after this year’s Budget,
former unregulated MSCs had reinvented themselves overnight
as ‘professional accountancy service providers’ inferring
they are regulated, which they are certainly not!
Not
only did they claim instant service change from ‘managed’ to ‘advisory’,
they were also asking us all to believe their people
culture and computer programmes had radically altered.
Hopefully, HMRC will soon see through these guises. Indeed,
HMRC is shortly issuing letters to such service providers,
whom it believes are MSC providers, asking them for information
about their business models and the numbers of clients
within each model. Although the provision of information
is purely voluntary, HMRC expects “a good response”.
HMRC has told Nyman Linden that it is aware of “several
providers who have restructured their services and we
will be monitoring compliance on an ongoing basis”.
During
a recent meeting of a small group of recruitment agencies
and a senior HMRC official, the agencies called for the
government to audit tax service providers and then issue
a list of approved ones. Contrary to subsequent reports
on various contractor sites, I can inform you this call
was rejected because “HMRC simply does not have
the manpower resource to conduct such compliance audits.” However,
the HMRC official was receptive to the idea of an audit
process by the regulated accountancy profession to vet
all service providers and he promised to refer the idea
to HM Treasury. This went down well with the agencies
who, up to this point, had been unfairly snubbing the
very profession that could be vetting their future. Watch
this space.
Questions
can be addressed either by letter or by email to: ‘Ask
The Accountant, c/o The Editor at intouch (email: intouch@taceurope.com).
We regret that we are unable to respond to unpublished
letters and, in order to facilitate publication, letters
may be edited. Nyman Linden is
a highly respected firm of Chartered Accountants who
specialise in providing advice and services to individuals
working on a freelance basis. For further information
about how Nyman Linden can help you, call them on 020
7535 1500. Nyman Linden, TAC Europe, TPS and their
respective employees cannot be held responsible for any
actions undertaken as a result of the opinions expressed
in this feature. As individual circumstances vary, you
are advised to seek individual expert advice.

|